Unchain the Gains: How Banks Can Master Blockchain by Letting Go of Fear
16 Mar 2024
16 Mar 2024 by Luke Puplett - Founder
Despite countless transformative technologies threatening to upend traditional finance, banks consistently undermine their own evolution by shackling innovation within archaic processes and power structures. Will this deeply rooted pattern of institutional inertia doom them as blockchain's decentralizing disruption looms?
Throughout the technology revolution, few industries have been as threatened by disruption yet so committed to self-inflicted stagnation as banking. Transformative innovations like distributed version control, agile methodologies, and cloud computing possessed the power to catapult financial institutions into new realms of efficiency and competitiveness. However, banks consistently sabotaged their own evolution by clinging to rigid processes, convoluted bureaucracies, and an aversion to relinquishing centralized control.
The disruptive potential of modern software development practices was utterly squandered in banking. Rather than embracing the collaborative workflows, automated pipelines, and robust audit trails that version control enabled, institutions attempted to contain these technologies within their antiquated waterfall cages. Agile became "WaterScrumFall" monstrosities - layered with micromanagement, bureaucracy, and faux-ceremonies that negated any intended benefits.
While tech giants iterated rapidly through DevOps and CI/CD, banks constrained developers with endless approval queues under the misguided belief that regulated environments demanded glacial rigidity. The very capabilities that could enhance regulatory compliance were subjugated under thinly-veiled fears of ceding control.
Cloud computing met a similar fate of forced self-sabotage. Though the agility and scalability of the cloud represented an existential opportunity, banks opted for expensive, inflexible on-premises models. Their fears - regulatory concerns, perceived security risks, and aversion to third-party control - overshadowed pragmatic vision.
Even as startups optimized for the cloud, banking developers found themselves calling outsourced teams in India to make the simplest of changes. The very innovators tasked with modernization found their capabilities compromised by the institutional forces of inertia.
This pattern reveals a paradox where banking's aversion to decentralizing authority, processes, and infrastructures directly undermined their ability to harness innovations aimed at accelerating these very capabilities. Rather than serve as launching pads for reinvention, transformative technologies became subjugated within existing power structures - diminishing their potency through self-inflicted constraints.
Now, as blockchain ascends with its tenets of decentralization, transparency and immutability, banks face a existential crossroads. Will they succumb to this perpetual cycle of force-fitting disruptive innovations into outdated centralized models? Or can they break free from the patterns of self-inflicted restraint that have plagued past technological paradigm shifts?
The path forward requires an uncompromising mindset evolution - recognizing blockchain as a strategic redefiner of the entire financial landscape, not just another IT implementation. This means fostering internal blockchain competencies, empowering autonomy, and entering synergistic partnerships - not relegating the capability to compromised, outsourced silos.
Most critically, banks must confront their deepest fears around decentralizing authority and infrastructure upon blockchain's distributed foundation. Attempting to subjugate this catalyzing force under existing power structures would be a catastrophic abdication of its transformative potential.
Only by deeply embracing blockchain's paradigm of innovative decentralization can banks flourish in the transparent, interoperable, and Byzantine fault-tolerant future it enables. Any half-measure will merely cement their legacies as industries that prized control over adaptation - upended by the very disruptions they failed to fully harness.
The choice is clear - uncompromisingly drive blockchain transformation by decentralizing authority and empowering innovators. Or succumb to the perpetual innovator's paradox by force-fitting this innovation into arcane centralized models until made obsolete by those who empowered its authentic evolution.
That's lovely and everything but what is Zipwire?
Zipwire Collect simplifies document collection for a variety of needs, including KYC, KYB, and AML compliance, plus RTW and RTR. It's versatile, serving recruiters, agencies, people ops, landlords, letting agencies, accountants, solicitors, and anyone needing to efficiently gather, verify, and retain documented evidence and ID.
Zipwire Approve is tailored for recruiters, agencies, and people ops. It manages contractors' timesheets and ensures everyone gets paid. With features like WhatsApp time tracking, approval workflows, data warehousing and reporting, it cuts paperwork, not corners.
For contractors & temps, Zipwire Approve handles time journalling via WhatsApp, and techies can even use the command line. It pings your boss for approval, reducing friction and speeding up payday. Imagine just speaking what you worked on into your phone or car, and a few days later, money arrives. We've done the first part and now we're working on instant pay.
Both solutions aim to streamline workflows and ensure compliance, making work life easier for all parties involved. It's free for small teams, and you pay only for what you use.